- #Tales of the mummy movie movie#
- #Tales of the mummy movie upgrade#
- #Tales of the mummy movie series#
#Tales of the mummy movie series#
My hunch proved correct that along this secluded stretch lie a series of tombs but who would be buried here? A Pharaoh I presume? Hidden Safely from ancient thieves.
Nine months of digging, finally an entrance has been discovered. Title: Russell Mulcahy’s Tale of the Mummy Director: Russell Mulcahy Writer: Russell Mulcahy, Keith Williams, John Esposito Starring: Louise Lombard, Jason Scott Lee, Sean Pertwee Year released: 1998 Their synopsis: When an archaeological expedition opens an ancient Egyptian tomb, the unimaginable evil of a cursed pharaoh is unleashed. The thrilling, fun, and violent mode of The Invisible Man proves that sometimes some monsters are worth resurrecting.
#Tales of the mummy movie movie#
We'll see all of these monsters again, but instead of a bloated, mega-budget action movie saga, they'll instead appear in riskier, more experimental, smaller-scale movies. It's already planning a Paul Feig monster ensemble comedy Dark Army, an Elizabeth Banks-starring Invisible Woman, and a movie about Renfield, Dracula's constantly exploited spider-eating servant. We're unlikely to ever see the pre- Mummy Dark Universe versions of these monster movies, but Universal isn't letting that hot, hot IP run away so soon. The Invisible Man is barely a gamble at all, and only stands to make money - it'll probably double its budget in its first weekend. The Invisible Man was made in 40 days for a measly $8 million: that's small potatoes compared to The Mummy's budget, which has been reported to be as high as $195 million.
#Tales of the mummy movie upgrade#
The movie is also co-produced by Blumhouse Productions - the horror-centric company behind Paranormal Activity, Insidious, Get Out, and Leigh Whannell's previous movie, the gory action thriller Upgrade - which works almost exclusively with extremely low-budget projects. (This is the only time Bardem and Depp have appeared physically in anything related to the Dark Universe.) But, seeing the response to The Mummy and unable to lock down anyone for their following movies, Universal quietly canned its shared monster movie series.ĭoes that mean we won't get a Frankenstein movie, or a Black Lagoon movie?īecause The Invisible Man is not tied to any sort of cinematic universe, it's allowed to be its own thing, which is what Universal Pictures seems to be planning for its stable of horror villain properties.
Universal was banking on a lot, casting sequels and teasing more monsters to come even before The Mummy had come out - they even released a "cast photo" of Tom Cruise, Sofia Boutella, Russell Crowe, Johnny Depp, and Javier Bardem, who had just been announced to play Frankenstein's monster in the Bride of Frankenstein movie. If The Mummy had done well, Evans' Dracula would likely have appeared in a following film. It was meant to be an origin story for the character, rather than sticking to the familiar Dracula tale, and includes a scene of Dracula and Charles Dance's evil vampire Caligula in the present day at the very end, as if setting the characters up for more. The Dark Universe actually started not with The Mummy, but with 2014's Dracula Untold, which starred Luke Evans as Vlad Dracula, and tried very hard to marry a very creative version of "history" with Bram Stoker's vampire character, to pretty much no success. Given all of that, you may be wondering if Leigh Whannell's new horror film The Invisible Man, which is a Universal movie based on a monster character from a classic book, is in any way related to the Dark Universe mess.Īh, Dark Universe, we hardly knew you. The Mummy absolutely tanked, was a critical failure, and the studios' other upcoming properties, including its Bride of Frankenstein and Wolf Man movies, were put on hold. is attempting with Kong: Skull Island and its Godzilla movies. With The Mummy, Universal Pictures launched and, at the same time, annihilated what they had planned to call the Dark Universe, a series of films centered around the studio's classic monster properties, from Dracula to Frankenstein to the Creature from the Black Lagoon, that would all be intricately tied together - like what Marvel is doing with its comic book superheroes and what Warner Bros. The one starring Tom Cruise? And Sofia Boutella? And an undead Jake Johnson, for some reason? You remember, right? You don't? Well, that's fine, because it was terrible: an embarrassingly bad cash-grab from a company needlessly trying to make a Marvel Cinematic Universe out of whatever they had available, focusing on all the wrong parts of what made their classic horror properties great in the first place. No, not The Mummy with Brendan Fraser, the other Mummy, from 2017. You may recall, a few years ago, tales of a movie called The Mummy.
0 kommentar(er)
